A scapegoat is a person who is blamed for the wrongdoings, mistakes, or faults of others, especially for reasons of expediency, which includes the quality of being convenient.
I must add that I am thankful for my substack but above all my readers and followers. You are different to the many I encounter outside the home. I think a lot has to do with education and travel, the attitude is far less insular.
I think most Muslims in Britain being of Tribal Pakistani origin is the focal point of the problem. Alot of them don’t understand civility & for so many years have used their religion mixed with their twisted tribal practices as a shield. Woke ideology & British elite have supported them, unwittingly or not, to become the face of Islam worldwide & put their tribal practices on a pedestal of “religiosity” when they’re all devils. It is something of a joke now online that if a recent Muslim immigrant even from non religious groups like Albanians or Turks moves to the UK, these sort of people entrench them into their practices.
I also think the few decent people don’t speak out against them because of the backlash they’d receive & one way or another, seeing how lenient the govt is with these people, they might fear its not worth it.
It is really infuriating & now the cat is out of the bag. The subcontinent is such a huge place, I don’t know who’s idea it was in the 60s to let people in from isolated villages.
The person or group of people whose idea it was, is a rabbithole worth pursuing.
Because I remember reading, during the times of British India, they had even criminalised the existence of certain tribal groups on the mainland Indian side. These groups were violent, would attack & rape anyone & safe to say uncivilised. The act allowed for such groups to be eradicated. Sounds cruel but it worked. So it is obvious Brits knew of all these different groups & that not all people in the Subcontinent are cut from the same cloth.. so it is incredibly suspicious why no one “filtered” people in the 60s.
Either all the intelligent men died in the world wars or this was done on purpose.
You must all read this. I’m in bloody turmoil as it clearly sets out the reality but I’d rather know it all the same. I just wonder even more about the future.
I must add that I am thankful for my substack but above all my readers and followers. You are different to the many I encounter outside the home. I think a lot has to do with education and travel, the attitude is far less insular.
https://www.redwallandtherabble.co.uk/the-deadly-price-of-denial-why-britain-is-losing-its-fight-against-islamism/
I think most Muslims in Britain being of Tribal Pakistani origin is the focal point of the problem. Alot of them don’t understand civility & for so many years have used their religion mixed with their twisted tribal practices as a shield. Woke ideology & British elite have supported them, unwittingly or not, to become the face of Islam worldwide & put their tribal practices on a pedestal of “religiosity” when they’re all devils. It is something of a joke now online that if a recent Muslim immigrant even from non religious groups like Albanians or Turks moves to the UK, these sort of people entrench them into their practices.
I also think the few decent people don’t speak out against them because of the backlash they’d receive & one way or another, seeing how lenient the govt is with these people, they might fear its not worth it.
It is really infuriating & now the cat is out of the bag. The subcontinent is such a huge place, I don’t know who’s idea it was in the 60s to let people in from isolated villages.
Thank you Sham for your comment.
You are spot on with regard to the tribalism of Pakistani Muslims and how that is enabled here in the west. Same with those scared to speak out.
Yes, whose “genius” let in people from isolated villages? Why did they do this???
The person or group of people whose idea it was, is a rabbithole worth pursuing.
Because I remember reading, during the times of British India, they had even criminalised the existence of certain tribal groups on the mainland Indian side. These groups were violent, would attack & rape anyone & safe to say uncivilised. The act allowed for such groups to be eradicated. Sounds cruel but it worked. So it is obvious Brits knew of all these different groups & that not all people in the Subcontinent are cut from the same cloth.. so it is incredibly suspicious why no one “filtered” people in the 60s.
Either all the intelligent men died in the world wars or this was done on purpose.
As soon as the term rabbit hole is mentioned I’m there! I want to explore!
Thanks so much for your thought provoking comments.
You must all read this. I’m in bloody turmoil as it clearly sets out the reality but I’d rather know it all the same. I just wonder even more about the future.
https://substack.com/@pallavidawson/note/c-162519420?r=1z31e2&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action